|
|
|
|
- Readme First! - Read and follow the rules, otherwise your posts will be closed |
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently, 703 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here |
|
|
|
|
|
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
| | | | |
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register | | | | |
Re: Editorial History on PHP-Nuke and Post-Nuke by Lawrence Krubner (Score: 1) by KingRichard on Thursday, February 20 @ 22:17:36 CET (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.nukeaddon.com | Childish? Well, I'm showing you the facts with prove from someone who did not run PHP Nuke nor PostNuke. If read correctly why PHP Nuke gain that category is because
"Given the insecurity history of this package, the Nessus
team recommands that you do not use it but
use something else instead, as security was clearly
not in the mind of the persons who wrote it."
As PostNuke coming out with patches meaning that the team are keep trying their best to mend out any hole that discover by the users. Is that what we all want? We never trying to cover our weakness, however we keep on improving.
Superior? did I ever mention Post Nuke is more superior? I just say "Tested them and compare" You'll see the different based on the usages, user friendliness, and off course speeds. |
| Parent | | | | | |
|